Well, today I
have to talk about something I care about or find interesting or like a lot… I’m
thinking about the violence’s “root” into the human being. I was thinking that
people are something very strange, I mean in the speech of humanity we aspire
to kindness, trying to throw out the wickedness of the society, but it goes for
us over and over through the years. We can see the effects of “violence” every hour
of our life, but what kind of violence?
That question is
interesting because it brings us to think in the author and the sense of
violence for him, from the idea of an action made by someone for something, it motivated
by a personality inside his mind… If we just see the problem in that way, we are
focusing individually, that is, we are thinking violence as a product of
individual wish, forgetting the social part of the problem, about the
historical conditions of daily life, the dynamics between the subject and the
group, and the power positions related to the government of societies.
I’m trying to
ask about the possibility to think the violence not only in individual terms,
depending on a wish emerging from the inside of the mind, because I believe
that psychological issues are mechanisms which were constructed as an answer of
environmental requirements, a way to process the relationship with other person
different to me.
Maybe the idea
of good/bad is useless to think about the root of violence, it could be like
this because they are opinions of the consequences of violent acts, but they
say nothing of why it happens in a specific time and how is the relation
between the author and the social context.